The best advice given to me in regards to teaching 9th grade English in a depressed neighborhood came from a colleague who teetered between ‘burn out’ and ‘frustration’ from years of bureaucratic red tape that hindered her from seeing the students achieve the greatness she knew existed within them. Her guidance and counsel aided in my mental preparation for what lie ahead. She told me “If your students are prompt to their seats, the conversations over-heard are mutually respectful or smiles warm up even the coldest corner of the room, it is a safe bet that you are among a rare group of people that will, more then likely, make our job as an educator a bit easier. However, if you walk into the classroom and your students are standing on the desks, disrespecting one another with verbal assaults and snarls ring from the rafters, your job description as an educator just included that of ‘juvenile delinquent warden’ and you are in for a challenging year.” She went on to advise “If the later of the two presents itself, have a plan to regain control of your room by strategically combining a ‘shock and awe’ approach that will help maintain classroom focus as well as ‘out of the box’ antics that will ignite an acute interest in subjects the students may find less enthralling.”
As wise as my friend was, in that moment I was having a difficult time understanding “why” anyone would find it necessary to use a tactic that, according to encyclopedia.com was used by the military, to “achieve rapid dominance over an adversary by the initial imposition of overwhelming force and firepower.” After all, these were just kids. Albeit most came from broken, unstable homes but they were children never the less. Still, she was a seasoned educator worth her weight in salt, so I made up my mind to do a little more research on instructors who opted to use ‘Shock and awe.” To my surprise, I found a few examples of teachers implementing a rapid dominance plan in their efforts to gain control of their classroom environment. One such illustration presented itself in “Stand and Deliver,” a movie based on a real life teacher, Mr. Escalante and the triumphs over social, physical and emotional challenges his students faced in their depressed neighborhood. On the first day of school, Escalante ‘shocks and awes’ his students by saying “There will be no free rides, no excuses. You already have two strikes against you: your name and your complexion. Because of those two strikes, there are some people in this world who will assume that you know less than you do. *Math* is the great equalizer...” I believe this direct and blunt / shock and awe statement built an immediate report with the students because they knew he understood where they were coming from and although they were not sure in the moment, they knew, on a sub-conscious level that his ‘statement bomb’ was truth and in that truth, he earned their respect.
Another example that I happened upon was the story of LouAnne Johnson, a U.S. Marine (retired) who accepted a position as an educator in an underprivileged high school in California. On her first day teaching, she faced a class full of tough and aggressive teenagers who showed zero respect or interest in their new teacher despite her efforts to win them over in the traditional manner. Realizing she was not gaining favor among the students, LouAnne responded by returning to school the next day in street clothes rather then typical ‘business attire’ and proceeded to teach, unconventionally, karate. Her ‘Shock and Awe” approach worked, temporarily, because the students showed some interest in the activity, thus opening the door to the realization that said tactic could work on a grander scale provided she was able to hone in on the needs and wants of the students.
Upon reflection of the examples of ‘Shock and Awe,” I realized having this weapon in my mental arsenal would be a necessary tool should I ever need to grab the attention of students who were otherwise disengaged from the material I was presenting. However, it occurred to me that once I got their attention, I was going to need to keep said attention. Had it not been for my colleagues second suggestion on maintaining order, I may have wasted time fretting over my options, but she was right thus far with her ‘grab and go’ method, so perhaps there was credence in her ‘out of the box’ approach to retaining information. When I was in school, a common stance for teaching “required material” was the “Banking Method.” The Banking Method is the process of passing on a cornucopias amount of data and trusting the student will regurgitate enough of the information to pass state standardized tests. As I do not subscribe to such application, “Out of the Box” thinking was a strategy I was very comfortable with, but would it fair well in an actual hostile classroom environment? Once again, I found myself seeking my references further experience to validate if such an approach may work and found that both Mr. Escalante and Mrs. Johnson coupled their personal ‘shock and awe’ with ‘out of the box thinking; and found great success.
Once Mr. Escalante addressed the social, economical and cultural biases with his students and shocked them into the idea of an alternative outcome to their futures, he determined the ‘out of the box’ approach best suited to his individual teaching style would be to speak a language the kids understood, slang and sarcasm. An example of his wit came when he was trying to explain negative numbers. A student, Raquel, posed the question “Can you have negative girlfriends?” To which Escalante replied “No, only negative boyfriends. Forgive us for we know not what we do.” By chiming in with, tongue in cheek sarcasm; he elicited a chuckle as well as admiration from his students. After time, the playful antics of bantering built a solid report between teacher and student, the end result, a group of student who sought to make their teacher proud. We know his approach was successful because his students went on to, not only take, but pass the AP Calculus exam and most went on to college. Something the majority of his students would have never done had he not thought, critically, out of the box.
Like Escalante, Johnson found a tool that she could use when the need for ‘out of the box’ thinking became an intricate part of maintaining focus. Desperate to reach the students, Mrs. Johnson exploited classroom exercises that taught similar principles to the prescribed work, but used themes and language that appealed to the streetwise students. By speaking to her students in the language they understood, and offering generous rewards such as candy bars and a field trip, Johnson was able to introduces the symbolism of poetry by show casing the works of Bob Dylan’s and Dylan Thomas, a subject no-one in the district would have assumed the students could ever comprehend let alone flourish in.
As a teacher in the new millennium, I have a plethora of examples from which I can pull from in an effort to engage, entertain and educate my students. In an ideal world, I will stand in the front of my classroom and captivate my audience and on their own accord, they will hear, understand and retain the breadth of information I am required to pass on. If I had my own way, I would be given free reign to creatively nourish the minds of tomorrows leaders without the bureaucracy of administrative red tape. But alas, I am a realist and I live in a society that thrives on ‘passing the buck’ with no regard to accountability to those any higher then the low man on the pole. Accordingly, my options are limited as to how far I can go in any one direction during the one hundred and ninety-six days of the academic year that I have the students. In the grand scheme of things, that is not a lot of time to hold court with an audience of adolescence, so quality of time is of the essence. Therefore, the advice given to me regarding maintaining order will not be in vein. I will implement the strategies of ‘shock and awe” to draw my students in and I will apply “out of the box thinking” to reinforce the material I am trying to pass on. Like Johnson and Escalante, my hope is that my students will find the desire to pursue higher education and perhaps, one day, find their way back to me with a report on how I made the difference between a good education and an excellent academic experience.
Work Cited
AMERICAN PROGRAM BUREAU. “LouAnne Johnson” APB Global Speaker
ELIZABETH KNOWLES. "Shock and Awe." The Oxford Dictionary of Phrase and Fable. 2006. Encyclopedia.com. 28 Nov. 2012 http://www.encyclopedia.com
LOUANNE JOHNSON. “My Posses Don’t Do Homework” New York: St. Martin’s, 1992
MENENDEZ, RAMON, “Stand and Deliver” Warner Home Video, 1998
PAULO FREIRE. “Pedagogy Of The Oppressed” New York: Continuum Books, 1993